Wednesday, September 26, 2012

INDIA: CAST ADRIFT BY AN ICEBERG


 

 

B.RAMAN

 

The Prime Minister Dr.Manmohan Singh was 80 yesterday. He is the second oldest Prime Minister the country has had. Morarji Desai was the oldest. He became Prime Minister in 1977 at 81 and left office at 83 two years later.

2. Dr. Manmohan Singh took over as the PM when he was 72.He would be 82 if he continues in office till 2014.Shri Atal Behari Vajpayee took over as the Prime Minister when he was 74 and left office at 80 after the defeat of his party in the elections of 2004. If the BJP had been returned to power in the 2004 elections, he might have continued as the PM till the age of 85.

3.Rajiv Gandhi was the youngest Prime Minister in the history of independent India. He became Prime Minister when he was 40 and left office at 45 after his Congress Party lost the elections of 1989. His mother Indira Gandhi was the second youngest Prime Minister in the history of independent India. She became the PM at the age of 49 and was assassinated when she was 67 in 1984. For three years between 1977 and 1980, she was in political wilderness. The remaining years between 1966 and 1984, she was in office as the Prime Minister. The other Prime Ministers of India were in office between 50 and 70 years of age.

4. Till 1991, when Narasimha Rao, on being sworn in as the Prime Minister, inducted Dr.Manmohan Singh as the Finance Minister, he had served as a bureaucrat and not as a politician. He joined the Congress after taking over as the Finance Minister in 1991. He enjoyed the total trust of Rao and was totally loyal to Rao.

5.Rao gave him a free hand to re-shape the economy and he performed the task creditably. His success as the Finance Minister between 1991 and 1996 was due to the fact that he and Rao were on the same wave-length on the need for liberalising and modernising the economy. He did not have to hold any important post in the party in order to be successful as the Finance Minister.

6. When he took over as the Prime Minister in 2004 at the request of Mrs.Sonia Gandhi, Dr.Manmohan Singh faced many handicaps due to the fact that he had never held any post in the party and people like Shri Pranab Mukherjee under whom he had worked as a bureaucrat were now required to work under him as the Prime Minister. Initially, this created uneasy personal equations but he managed to get over them. Another major difficulty faced by him arose from the fact that the primary loyalty of the Ministers from the Congress in his Council of Ministers was to Mrs.Sonia Gandhi and not to him. There was and there still is no Minister whose primary loyalty is to Dr.Manmohan Singh.

7. During his first tenure as the Prime Minister, the country faced some major internal security problems. The Maoist insurgents spread their area of operations over large tracts of Central India. There was a major act of mass casualty terrorism carried out by Pakistan-sponsored jihadi terrorists in the suburban trains of Mumbai in July 2006. There were many acts of jihadi terrorism by the Indian Mujahideen in different cities of India in 2007 and 2008. There was a three-day commando-style attack on different targets in Mumbai between November 26 and 29,2008, by sea-borne terrorists of the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LET).

8. Despite the deterioration in the internal security situation during his first tenure in the rest of India, the situation in Jammu and Kashmir registered a qualitative improvement with new ideas for finding a solution to the Kashmir problem with Pakistan being discussed with positive results through back channels with the regime of Gen.Pervez Musharraf in Pakistan. If the terrorism situation in Punjab improved and normalcy was restored when Narasimha Rao was the Prime Minister, the situation in J&K improved under Dr.Manmohan Singh for which credit has to be given to him.

9. Under the management of Shri P.Chidambaram as the Finance Minister, the economy registered considerable improvement and India was taken as seriously as China in the economic decision-making circles of the world. Dr. Manmohan Singh along with President Hu Jintao of China was invited to the head table in all economic summits. Chindia became a much used expression in characterising the economic race between India and China.

10. Foreign policy was another major area of success between 2004 and 2009, with India and the US coming closer together and with India’s relations with China showing improvement despite the suspicions caused in Bejing by the Indo-US strategic partnership and the initiatives taken by the Manmohan Singh Government for  improving relations with Singapore, Vietnam, Japan, South Korea and Australia.

11. During this period, Dr.Manmohan Singh was only Prime Minister by half with much of political authority and prominence remaining in the hands of Mrs.Sonia Gandhi. Despite this, his visible and palpable record was positive.

12. At the same time, a huge iceberg of corruption, nepotism, crony governance and favouritism was gathering shape and strength under his administration. His reluctance and inability to control the Ministers from the coalition partners under the pretext of coalition dharma or coalition compulsions contributed to the formation of this iceberg. The tip of this iceberg was seen in 2010 in the so-called Radia tapes which brought out the enormous political influence that an apparently mediocre person had been able to acquire over the decision and opinion-making process by taking advantage of the permissive atmosphere that prevailed. The iceberg hit the Government in 2011---with one scam after another, with one irregularity after another and with one wrong-doing after another denting the credibility of the Prime Minister.

13.But even before the iceberg hit the Indian ship, one could see the gathering storm and darkening clouds from different directions. The shifting of Shri Chidambaram from the Finance Ministry to the Home Ministry after the 26/11 terrorist strikes improved our internal security management, but considerably weakened our economic management. This weakening of the economic management took place at a time of the global economic melt-down. India came to be seen less and less as a success story and more and more as a stalling economy. References to Chindia disappeared from debates in international financial circles.

14. The crisis and the drift called for strong leadership that came to be missing. The duality of control between Mrs.Sonia Gandhi and the Prime Minister added to the gravity of the drift. Instead of admitting the gravity of the iceberg that had hit the State and his Government and trying to bring the ship back under control, Dr.Manmohan Singh and his Ministers tried to deny the presence of the iceberg.

15. Only now, there has been a belated realisation that India is adrift and needs a strong and decisive leadership to bring it back on the route of progress and development. One has to welcome the hard economic decisions already taken by the Government and the support that the Prime Minister has received from his party for those decisions. As I had pointed out in an earlier article, this is only the beginning. More hard decisions are required not only in the field of economy, but also in respect of administrative reforms to deal with corruption and to improve further the national security  machinery.

16. It is time for the Prime Minister to convince the people that those decisions will be forthcoming and will be implemented even if they lead to early elections and the possibility of a defeat for his party. Dr.Manmohan Singh has less than two years left in office. He can still salvage his reputation and that of his Government and party by doing all that needs to be done to restore the confidence of the people.

17. The need of the hour is not only for better leadership and governance, but also for a greater role for GenNext in policy and decision making and implementation. It is a time of transition from the old to the young. The transition should be expedited and not delayed. ( 27-9-12)

 

(The  writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate of the Chennai Centre For China Studies. E-mail: seventyone2@gmail.com  Twitter @SORBONNE75)

 

5 comments:

Visible Trade said...

Is this a paid Blog?
No significant external factors have been considered (eg. - 9/11 incident, invasion of Afghanistan, Large liquidity injection by US driving a decade of global growth, etc) and the article has been written in a language which reeks of political motivations.

peter g. said...

Mr.Ramans article is well written.The external factors were not relevant to the article, at least from his perspective. It definitely does not "reek of political motivations" as alleged by Visible Trade who appears to have a poor grasp of the language hence unable to appreciate the article.

Visible Trade said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Visible Trade said...

Mr. Raman has attributed cause and credit to people and factors based on incomplete information [presented] and poor quality of analysis.
As Mr. Raman likes to present himself as an unbiased and thorough analyst for public consumption, and as he presents himself as an expert based on a career which he is very emphatic on, it is only reasonable to expect better quality of analysis than he was able to deliver here. It is not important what Mr Raman thinks is important from his perspective; as an analyst, it is his duty to analyze completely - even if he thinks external factors are not important then it should have been mentioned that it was analyzed and found not important. However, my conjecture is that his understanding is outdated and limited on certain external issues especially of economic and monetary nature. Still, his omission of an analysis of the impact of war in Afghanistan on India's improved internal security position before attributing credit (surprisingly quite early in the article) is puzzling.
When one analyzes political issues at politically important times, and presents such work, it is reasonable to expect monetary motivations are involved because the other logical conclusion is more offending.
I would not like to comment on peter g's language and analysis abilities based on this limited interaction.
I hope that both of us (perter and I) will improve even further from our present abilities.

city said...

thanks for sharing.