Sunday, March 1, 2009



Reliable details of the two-day (February 25 and 26, 2009) mutiny of some junior ranks of the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) against Army officersare still scanty. However, even the limited details available so far indicate that the situation was and continues to be much more seriousthan was originally thought. It could flare up again if not handled with care by the Prime Minister, Sheikh Hasina, the Army Chief , GeneralMoeen U Ahmed, and the new Director-General of the BDR, Brig Gen Moinul Hossain.

2.Sheikh Hasina and the Army chief are till now acting in tandem in dealing with the sequel to the mutiny, but the critics of Sheikh Hasinaare already turning their guns on her as the holder of the defence portfolio for not reacting promptly to the mutiny in order to put it down andprevent the massacre of a large number of senior officers of the Army by the jawans (soldiers) and other junior ranks of the BDR. While theArmy chief himself has reiterated his faith in the civilian leadership, individual senior officers have been critical of Sheikh Hasina forallegedly not allowing the Army to intervene on February 25 itself after the mutiny broke out and for trying to deal with the situation throughher Home Minister, Sahara Khatun, under whom the BDR comes.

3. The constitution of two parallel probe committees-----one by the Home Minister and the other by the Army--- speaks of the lack ofconfidence of the army in the thoroughness of any probe by the committee set up by the Home Minister. Reports indicate that only those,who did not participate in the mutiny, have so far surrendered to the Army or the police and that many---if not most---of those whoparticipated in the mutiny have managed to go underground. The Army is focussing its enquiries on those , who held the peace talks withthe Home Minister in a local restaurant in response to his appeal before the talks broke down. The suspected ring leaders are four DeputyAssistant Directors (DAD) of the BDR-----Touhidul Alam, Nasiruddin Khan, Mirza Habibur Rahman and Abdul Jalil, --- sepoy Md Selim and Abdur Rahim, whose rank in the BDR is not known.

4. The National Standing Committee of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) of Begum Khalida Zia,in a statement on February 28,2009, alleged that the 'action and reaction' in the wake of the killings in the mutiny proved the Government's total failure to resolve the crisis.“Narrow mentality and controversial steps and statements of the Government made the situation more complex,” it said and added: "TheGovernment could not take timely steps to prevent the killing of army officers and their family members, and torture on women andchildren.The Prime Minister, who is also the Defence Minister, cannot avoid responsibility for the failure to take effective measures toprotect arms and ammunition, and prevent escape of criminals.”

5. From the details available so far, the following reconstruction is possible: Maj Gen Shakil Ahmed, who was the Director-General of the BDR,and his wife were extremely unpopular with the jawans of the BDR, who used to accuse them of being corrupt and of misusing or misappropriating funds meant for providing relief to the families of poor jawans.The BDR was observing the BDR Week from February24,2009, to mark its raising day. About 6300 personnel of the BDR were to participate in the various functions organised in this connection.About 3300 of them belonged to BDR battalions stationed in Dhaka. The remaining came from the various field units. Sheikh Hasina inaugurated the Week at a function in the Darbar (conference) hall of the BDR headquarters in their campus at Pilkana on February 24.Some directly-recruited junior officers and other ranks of the BDR had requested Maj.Gen.Shakil Ahmed to allow them to meet her separatelyafter the inaugural function to express their grievances to her. He turned down their request. On coming to know of this, she wanted to meetthem. He advised her not to do so on the ground that it might weaken the discipline. She did not insist on meeting them.

6. That night, pamphlets criticising Shakil Ahmed, his wife and other army officers circulated in the campus. Either the army officers andmilitary and civilian intelligence agencies were not aware of it or they ignored it under the impression that this was one of those thingswhich keep happening in the BDR. On February 25, a conference was held in the Darbar Hall, which was addressed by by Shakil Ahmed. Ashe was interacting with the staff, some persons wearing red head bands and wielding machine guns forced their way into the hall andstarted shouting slogans against him and opened fire indiscriminately.

7. There are two versions as to what happened to him. According to one version, he was shot dead inside the darbar hall itself. According tothe other version, he and other Army officers ran out of the hall in panic and fled to their residences or offices located inside the campus.Shakil Ahmed himself ran to his house. Some of the mutineers chased him there and killed him and his wife, Some other mutineers chasedthe other officers to their offices or residences and killed them.

8. A number of other jawans and junior officers of the BDR, who initially did not participate in the mutiny, took guns from the BDR armouryand joined the mutineers in their killing spree. Thousands of bullets were fired indiscriminately all over the campus by rampaging personnelof the BDR. When Sheikh Hasina heard of the mutiny and the firing, she thought that the mutineers had taken some Army officers hostage.She, therefore, asked her Home Minister to establish contact with the mutineers and persuade them to release the hostages. She wasreportedly not aware that the mutineers had started massacring the officers the moment the mutiny started. It is understood that even theArmy chief was not aware of this.

9. The moment the mutiny broke out, there was an almost total black-out of communications between the Army officers caught inside theBDR headquarters and their superiors in the Army headquarters. Before the mutiny, the mutineers had disrupted all land line telephones.All the army officers caught inside had mobile telephones. Only one of them managed to send out a distress message. Others could notcommunicate. It is not known why this was so. Some reports suggest that the mutineers had seized all mobile telephones from the officersinside. Thus, while the mutineers were able to remain in touch with their colleagues all over Bangladesh, the Army officers caught insidewere unable to communicate with anybody. The Army sent an armed group to the BDR campus to find out what was happening. It also senttwo helicopters to fly over the campus. They all withdrew when the mutineers opened fire on them.

10.Only by the morning of February 26,2009,did the extent of the savagery become evident to Sheikh Hasina and the Army. She authorisedthe Army to intervene and broadcast a warning message to the mutineers. The sight of the deployment of Army tanks and heavy artilleryaround the campus unnerved the mutineers and they called off the mutiny. It is not yet known how many of them managed to escape fromDhaka and how many surrendered.

11. When the Army entered the campus and started looking for the Army officers caught inside, it realised with shock the extent of thesavagery perpetrated by the BDR mutineers. So far, the Army has recovered the badly mutilated bodies of 73 army officers and somecivilians including wives and other family members of the killed officers. It is repored that there were 137 Army officers of various ranksinside the BDR campus when the mutiny broke out. The remaining are missing and feared killed. Their bodies have not yet been recovered.Many of the recovered bodies carried bullet as well as bayonet injuries. The bodies of the wives of some of the killed officers had beendisfigured. Neither Pakistan nor Bangladesh, where miitary revolts and rule are common, had seen a savagery of this kind since the Britishleft the sub-continent in 1947.

12.Brigadier General Mahmud Hossain, Director of Military Intelligence, told a press conference in Dhaka on the night of February 28,2009,that the army was ready to storm the headquarters of the BDR soon after the mutiny erupted, but heeded Sheikh Hasina's advice at thelast minute to resolve the issue politically."The Prime Minister directed that the crisis should be solved politically and it has been resolved inthat manner." He described the incidents as "possibly the worst massacre of army officers in Bangladesh's history", and added that theanger among the armed forces was "very natural". He said the army has begun its own probe into the killings of its officers during the mutinyeven as the investigation ordered by a government-constituted committee continues.

13. One of those missing is Colonel Gulzar Uddin Ahmed, of the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), who had played an active role in the driveagainst the jihadi organisations such as the Jamia'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB).Before being promoted as Additional DG of the RAB, hewas in its intelligence wing and had commanded the operation that had led to the capture and execution of JMB operations commanderSiddiqul Islam alias Bangla Bhai.

14.The belief in Bangladesh official circles is that the BDR mutiny was triggered off partly by the unaddressed grievances over the living andservice conditions and partly by anger over the action of the Army chief in carrying out the death sentences awarded to Bangla Bhai andother jihadi leaders in 2007. There has reportedly been a penetration of the BDR by the Hizbut Tehrir which was very critical of theexecutions which were projected by it as carried out under US pressure.(2-3-09).

(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai. E-Mail:

1 comment:

Col Saif said...

The BDR carnage was a systematic preplanned killing of the best collection of army officers who were national assets. Nothing can replace this damage. This has severely affected the morale of all members of the armed forces. Some people believe military action could have been the best option to take control of the situation given the fact the rebels were too afraid to run away if army moved in. However, the Prime Minister of Bangladesh wisely opted for a peaceful solution rather than purely military action, fearing it could mess up the conflict into a full-blown bloodbath within the BDR compound. The decision was very critical, which is now proved to have been handled with remarkable political wisdom and foresight, resolve and equanimity. The army has also shown remarkable good sense, they remained absolutely steadfast to the unified command though there were many agitation and anger under the uncertainly of the situation and external provocation. While the bereaved are struggling to comfort each other from the grief, I find some strong media sympathetically glorifying the demands of the mutineers. I have only two questions to ask: 1. Why the rebels had to kill them all and conduct such carnage well before their demands communicated? 2. When the PM promised to consider all their demands, why they all chose to abscond?